Group Stratification and Coordination Failure in a Continuous N-Player Stag Hunt
نویسندگان
چکیده
We reveal spontaneous group formation and differentiation in an online dynamic coordination experiment. We observe increased group stratification and attribute it to increases in pairwise cooperative behavior, rather than uncooperative behavior. Our network analyses document the fine scale structure of coordination failure in the face of many established determinants of coordination success. We explore previous work in coordination failure to frame our own findings. Factors that have been previously shown to improve coordination in discretetime, forced-decision experimental games do not prevent decisive coordination failure in our real-time, asynchronous group decision-making environment.
منابع مشابه
The effect of group size and cheap talk in the multi-player stag hunt: experimental evidence
Numerous studies have looked at the factors that influence the likelihood of successful coordination. Two of the most important factors are the size of the group and whether communication is possible. To our knowledge, there has been no systematic study of the interaction between group size and communication. We report results from an experiment in which groups of size 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 play a o...
متن کاملAssessing Others' Risk‐Taking Behavior from Their Affective States: Experimental Evidence Using a Stag Hunt Game
Researchers are increasingly exploring the role of emotions in interactive decision-making. Recent theories have focused on the interpersonal effects of emotions—the influence of the decision-maker’s expressed emotions on observers’ decisions and judgments. In this paper, we examine whether people assess others’ risk preferences on the basis of their emotional states, whether this affects their...
متن کاملCoordination in Games with Incomplete Information: Experimental Results
We use experiments to study coordination in games with incomplete information and ask whether an informed player can use cheap talk strategically. Two players decide whether to enter a market where stage game payoffs either form a prisoner’s dilemma or a stag-hunt. One player knows which stage game is played while the other knows only the associated probabilities. When players engage in a priso...
متن کاملJump-starting coordination in a stag hunt: Motivation, mechanisms, and their analysis
The stag hunt (or assurance game) is a simple game that has been used as a prototype of a variety of social coordination problems (ranging from the social contract to the adoption of technical standards). Players have the option to either use a superior cooperative strategy whose payoff depends on the other players’ choices or use an inferior strategy whose payoff is independent of what other p...
متن کاملStress Induces Contextual Blindness in Lotteries and Coordination Games
In this paper, we study how stress affects risk taking in three tasks: individual lotteries, Stag Hunt (coordination) games, and Hawk-Dove (anti-coordination) games. Both control and stressed subjects take more risks in all three tasks when the value of the safe option is decreased and in lotteries when the expected gain is increased. Also, subjects take longer to take decisions when stakes are...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010